Personal
Definition of Distance Learning
Prior to viewing instructional resources aligned
with this course, Distance Learning (DL), I defined DL as an online synchronous
instructional format where students participate without physically appearing in
a traditional classroom setting. I
derived at the understanding because in 1997 during a conference at Florida
International University, a panel of students from different schools
participated in a blended course by debating in real-time, through satellite
compressed video (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012), relevant
issues to the future of K-12 educational systems. The professor served as the moderator
controlling the discussion and the switching of the camera to view the speaker. Additionally, in 1998 I taught an
administrative assistant program at a technical school. Two disabled students participated in the
program daily, but off campus at two different libraries. Each morning, I had to turn on a V-Tech system
where the students could view the classroom and participate in lecture discussions.
A document camera was used to project the teacher’s computer screen for
demonstrations and to show hard copies.
These experiences helped me to form my personal definition of DL.
Revised
Definition
Simonson et al (2012) denotes distance learning
as institutionally-based, “formal education where the learning group is
separated, and where interactive telecommunications systems are used to connect
learners, resources, and instructors (p. 32).”
This term includes distinct features:
1) used primarily by institutions with courses eligible for
accreditation, 2) distance factored into the course offering with a possible
variable of time and space, 3) use of alternative interaction means of
communication via technology or other logistic means like the postal system,
and 4) the use of learning communities and course resources. These features enabled the connection of
teachers and students to socially move learners academically forward.
My former experience with distance learning
similarly aligns with most of Simonson et al (2012) definition of DL. However, clarification of the coined use of
distance learning, coming primarily from institutions and the inclusion of a
social aspect for learners, is new to me.
However, I can see why distance learning should be encompassed by
institutions to gain accreditation primarily to ensuring high standards of
quality for learners.
Vision for
Distance Learning
I envision the future of DL as being an
inevitable means of instructional delivery because technology improvements
continue to improve. In fact I predict
that with the advancement of mobile and tablet technology, which includes WI-FI
access, DL will overtake secondary education, higher education, and corporate
training partly because the current generation shows a high growth in the
virtual school format (Huett, Moller, Foshay, & Coleman, 2008). Our traditional form of education could be
obsolete or available with limited use as an area of specialty for individuals
requiring one-on-one or small group assistance.
However skilled training for job performance should continue with
teacher lead instruction including demonstrations and practical hands-on
experience.
Observing my 4 year old grandson influenced my
thinking on the future of Distance Learning.
One day my grandson grabbed my cell phone wanting to view a “Letter Y”
instruction video on YouTube. Because I
never used the feature before, I gave up easily on navigating through the
system to locating the application.
Amazingly, within seconds, he found the search option. He only needed me
to type the proper query. For me the
unknown was is a struggle, but young learners use informal training to adapt
swiftly to real-word, problem solving situations..
Conclusion
Brick and motar cannot hold our future learners back. As technology advances, the
comfort level of users improves and demonstrates empowerment. DL enables students “not normally
communicative in a face-to-face classroom (Huett et al., 2008, p. 63)” to
open-up and communicate more through the alternative format. Use of Web 2.0s like social media enables
today’s learners to work collaboratively with peers and experts to solve
real-world problems (Shaffer, 2011).
References
Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Coleman,
C. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional
design on the potential of the web (Part 3: K12). TechTrends,
52(5), 63–6 7.
Shaffer, S. (2011, October 21). Colleges embrace social media in the
classroom. Retrieved from http://www.classesandcareers.com/education/2011/10/21/classroom-social-media/.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., &
Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
No comments:
Post a Comment